Repeat orders can look straightforward, yet small revisions may make an old die unsuitable for a new product. File, material and production history are reviewed together.
Old and new files are compared
The new PDF is more useful when changed dimensions, flaps, holes, crease lines or orientation are marked clearly.
- Old and new files are shared together.
- Changed areas are highlighted.
- Revision date is added to the filename.
Check whether material is unchanged
The same drawing can behave differently on another material. If gsm or thickness changed, old die settings are reviewed again.
- New material details are written.
- Gsm or thickness changes are stated.
- Lamination changes are noted.
The old die is inspected physically
Storage conditions, blade condition and rubbering affect repeat production quality. Old dies are checked before use.
- Blade bending is checked.
- Rubber wear is inspected.
- Moisture or impact marks are checked.
Written revision records reduce errors
The common repeat-order mistake is mixing old information with a new product. Written revision records lower that risk.
- Keep the approval message.
- Use one final file.
- Store production notes with the die.
Quote details we clarify together
When the file, material, quantity and deadline are clear, the quote conversation moves faster and with less back-and-forth.
- Current revision file
- Material and quantity details
- Critical dimensions or production notes
- Deadline expectation and delivery preference